The major political parties in Britain are a false paradigm : they only appear to the public as ‘different’ or ‘seperate’, and only to the public do they appear to be ‘at war’ with each other. The vast majority of policies that the three parties hold are merely mirror images: the differences are in the means to reaching the wanted end point.
All three parties -and the other, small ones such as the Green party and UKIP - follow are full supporters of the Unite Against Fascism group, as are Trades Unions. These people are funded from tax-payers (local council tax and nationally collected) monies, the subs of Trade Union members, and from Lottery Funds.
They are lead by Weyman Bennet, a black man, who is a senior member of the Socialist Workers Party, a Trotskyist organisation. They are a group which advocates and encourages violence against the BNP, using fascistic tactics, reminicent of the Brownshirts in pre war Germany.
Remember – the TORIES – the defenders of CAPITALISM are in bed with the Trotskyists, sworn enemies of CAPITALISM.
The Labour Party – famous for expelling all kinds of Marxist groups in the past, such as MILITANT in the eighties – is in bed with Weyman Bennet, leader of the UAF and a sworn MARXIST.
The LIB DEMS – defenders of free speech, tolerance and liberty – are best friends with the NEW BROWNSHIRTS of the UAF, whose tactics mirror the Hitlerites.
Next time you vote, if you vote for the standard political parties, you are voting for the UAF, the SWP and Weyman Bennett. Looks like a communist, friends with communists, is a communist.
JONATHON PORRITT, one of Gordon Brown’s leading green advisers, is to warn that Britain must drastically reduce its population if it is to build a sustainable society.
Porritt’s call will come at this week’s annual conference of the Optimum Population Trust (OPT), of which he is patron.
The trust will release research suggesting UK population must be cut to 30m if the country wants to feed itself sustainably.
Porritt said: “Population growth, plus economic growth, is putting the world under terrible pressure
“Each person in Britain has far more impact on the environment than those in developing countries so cutting our population is one way to reduce that impact.”
Population growth is one of the most politically sensitive environmental problems. The issues it raises, including religion, culture and immigration policy, have proved too toxic for most green groups.
However, Porritt is winning scientific backing. Professor Chris Rapley, director of the Science Museum, will use the OPT conference, to be held at the Royal Statistical Society, to warn that population growth could help derail attempts to cut greenhouse gas emissions.
Rapley, who formerly ran the British Antarctic Survey, said humanity was emitting the equivalent of 50 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere each year.
“We have to cut this by 80%, and population growth is going to make that much harder,” he said.
Such views on population have split the green movement. George Monbiot, a prominent writer on green issues, has criticised population campaigners, arguing that “relentless” economic growth is a greater threat.
Many experts believe that, since Europeans and Americans have such a lopsided impact on the environment, the world would benefit more from reducing their populations than by making cuts in developing countries.
This is part of the thinking behind the OPT’s call for Britain to cut population to 30m — roughly what it was in late Victorian times.
Britain’s population is expected to grow from 61m now to 71m by 2031. Some politicians support a reduction.
Phil Woolas, the immigration minister, said: “You can’t have sustainability with an increase in population.”
The Tory leader, David Cameron, has also suggested Britain needs a “coherent strategy” on population growth.
Despite these comments, however, government and Conservative spokesmen this weekend both distanced themselves from any population policy. ”
Porrit and his pal David Attenborough and many others on today’s ruling elite are believers in Eugenics. They have merely rechristened it as Population Control, no longer speak about racial purity, idiots, feebleminded etc, but is is still the bastard child of Malthus and Darwin, and just as deadly for you and me.
Because they – the Elite – will do the choosing.
Here’s the potted history of eugenics.
Charles Darwin wrote about Evolution. He and his fololowers (TH Huxley – ‘Darwin’s Bulldog’, Herbert Spenser etc.) proposed that there was a Struggle to Survive, a War of All Against Each, and that Only the Strong Survive. All of this from nature. At the same time – the 1860′s onward – there was in Britain and the US movementsa to allieviate through government action the deplorable state of much of the population (poverty, slums, malnutrition) that the Victorian people saw. Agitiaition for expandin the franchise in Britain – finally leading to the vote for all adults over 21 in 1918 – meant that the Elite, the wealthiest in the pyramid of life – would be those predominately taxed to pay for the social measures demanded by the emerging middle and working classes.
Darwin’s work, and the writings of such men as Spenser and Huxley lead to a popularity amongst the political class of Britain and the US for a method of social engineering.This fell into the categories of:
Racial hygiene (the removal/sterrlilisation of blacks etc)
The control of birth rates of other undesirables – Italians, Roman Catholics
The strengthening of the racial purity of whites: that a stronger white race should be built through selective breeding.
The latter became especially important during the Boer War and WW1 when it became apparent to the Elite that the white working class were so degenerate physically that millions could not realistically be expected to fight as they were unfit, even as recruitment requirements were dropped – look at photographs of British soldiers in the latter part of WW1 – many are below 5 feet three inches!
Britain never introduced Eugenics legislation, due to the unique contribution of G K Chesterton in his work Euenics and Other Evils. He almost single handedly derailed the proposals, supported by such important characters as Winston Churchill.And of course this support was not just a Capitalist thing – the Fabians – the Webbs, HG Wells, George Bernard Shaw – were lovers of eugenics.
Eugenic ideas gained ground at the time of the Boer War (1899-1903), when it was found that many young men from slum backgrounds were unfit for military service. It was also noticed that healthy men from richer backgrounds also came from smaller families. The same fact was also observed in 1939 when it was discovered that the cause had nothing to do with hereditary factors – but was simply the result of poor diet leading to the bone-deforming disease, rickets. In 1904, the Conservative government of Arthur Balfour established a Royal Commission “On the Care and Control of the Feebleminded,” which reported in 1908 to the new Liberal government. It recommended compulsory detention of the mentally inadequate, as well as sterilisation of the unfit. Up to this point mental asylums were used only for the criminally insane, judged to be a danger to themselves and others.
Eugenics became a widespread progressive cause promoted by the Fabian Society, and was closely allied with similar arguments for birth control. In 1903, H. G. Wells wrote: “the conclusion is that if we could prevent or discourage the inferior sort of people from having children, and if we could stimulate and encourage the superior sort to increase and multiply, we should raise the general standard of the race.” Dr. Saleeby, one of the most distinguished doctors of his day, advocated that people intending to marry should have “health books” proving that they had no congenital deformity. Other enthusiastic eugenists were Shaw, who put forward eugenic arguments in his play, Man and Superman, and the sex investigator Havelock Ellis. Ellis was a weird pervert worthy of his successor, Kinsey. Impotent himself, it never seems to have occurred to him whether he was a “degenerate” or “unfit.” The leaders of the radical Socialist Fabians were the husband and wife team of Beatrice and Sydney Webb. Fabian Tract No. 131, written by Sydney in 1907, states:
In Great Britain at this moment, when half, or perhaps two-thirds of all the married people are regulating their families, children are being freely born to the Irish Roman Catholics and the Polish, Russian and German Jews, the thriftless and irresponsible. . . . This can hardly result in anything but national deterioration . . . or this country falling to the Irish and the Jews.
(ED: It is worth noting the word progressive: that is what the Socialist/Eugenics supporters were originally part of in the US in the late Victorian era. The word Progressive became tainted because of Eugenics and WW2, and the mantel of Liberal was adopted, only for liberal to become sullied by the failures of Marxist socialism in post Ww2 US, so Hillary Clinton (amonstother US Democrat s – is now rebirthing the name Progressive in the US. )
These bastards today, such as Porritt, the Green Party, Optimum Population Trust are the same Elite scum, who want to kill you and me, and anyone not bred for greatness like themselves, as much as any nazi racial hygenist. They are the same. If you live in the fantasy that somehow it will be them, not you that it is in the target zone,. is to lie to yourself, and threaten the very existence of yourself, your children and the future.
Abortion, Contraception, ‘Family Planning’ and Social Engineering are there to destroy us and reinforce the power of those at the top: the Elite. The horrible, atheistic, self centred and self indulgent societies created by the Frankfurt Institute, communist philosophers and Freud’s nephew Edward Bernays, by Isiah Berlin, Feminism, the ‘Sexual Revolution, the sexual perversion of children through both education and media, by the NeoCons of Wall Street- all there to deplete, to weaken, to remove us: the vibrant, teeming mass, creative, destructive, loving hating, emotional, demanding, living and laughing.
Here’s a piece of truth. Had the Elites had not dumped billions of pounds worth of free charity food onto the hungry billions in the third world, then they would have either adapted their lives to modern methods of farming, industry, their families reducing in size, would be healthier, more productive, or died. Isn’t it funny that they have, instead encouraged the third world populations to grow well beyond the traditional farming and industry they operate? It is to create the crisis that will demand an answer.
Eugenics was and is today the RICH and ELITE people’s defence of their power and wealth. However they may dress it – like the Fabians, Like Churchill, whatever Utopian schemes are created around it. The Reverend Malthus, the believer that we would eat ourselves to annihilation, was wrong then. He was merely a lackey of those who future generations would go on to encourage the mass murder of millions in the twentieth century, in the Gulags, the Concentration camps, and the Abortion & Mass sterrilisation camps, clinics and hospitals of both Communist China, India and the US and Europe.
Today’s population controllers are a scary and powerful lot. But they have a great weakness in their own history, inextricably bound up with the massive, ghastly fertility control campaigns Connelly describes; always aimed at the poor, not just in poor countries, but also in the USA, Sweden and all over the world. It was a war (described and conducted as such, often by military men such as the USA’s General William Draper and China’s Xinzhong Qian) that ruined millions upon millions of lives – yet had no particular effect in the end on numbers: growth was already declining. ‘It turns out that about 90 percent of the difference in fertility rates worldwide derived from something very simple and very stubborn: whether women themselves wanted more or fewer children.’ All the evidence so far suggests that attempts to control world migration are equally futile. Will they meet the same fate, and if so, at whose hands?
At the apparent height of its power, the population control bandwagon suddenly collapsed. First, it hit mounting, massive grassroots resistance; then came the global reproductive rights movement, which utterly routed it at the UN’s Population Conference in Cairo in 1994. Population control became a tar baby. Organisations that had backed coercion, transformed themselves into champions of autonomy overnight. Others changed their names. The American Eugenics Society became the Society for the Study of Social Biology; Eugenics Quarterly became Social Biology. In the UK, in 1988, the Eugenics Society renamed itself The Galton Institute (after the founder of Eugenics, Francis Galton).
Will the wheels fall off ‘managed migration’ in similar fashion? This too is being challenged increasingly by the people it oppresses. And the bigger it gets, the harder it becomes to conceal its shameful underpinnings.
Migration Watch craves the spotlight but also fears it. It has fought hard to stop people knowing that its co-founder, Oxford University’s Professor David Coleman, has been a lifelong member of the Eugenics Society, and one of its high officials during the decades when sterilisation campaigns were at their peak. What, if any, part did he play in all that? He is known to have been a government adviser during the 1980s and examined the then fashionable question of state benefits for single, working-class mothers. But when this aspect of his past was brought to public notice by students in early 2007, his response was not to answer their concerns but to pillory them as ‘tyrannical’. The Daily Telegraph gave him a whole page in which to vent his indignation – which he managed to do without mentioning eugenics once, let alone explaining his role in it.
Increasingly people know about this connection and they cannot help joining the increasingly plentiful dots. Migration Watch’s other autumn coup – getting the imprimatur of a cross-party Parliamentary group (albeit an unofficial one) for their Balanced Migration report – came at the price of public association with anti-abortionist, anti-assisted pregnancy obsessive, Frank Field (not to mention the widely abhorred Nicholas Soames).
All the makings are here for the badly needed, total and indeed comical rout of Woolas, Smith, Green, Coleman, Field and all their friends and minions – and their replacement by people with the guts to tackle the real ‘thorny issue’: the rich.
A socialist with his head screwed on – and he’s quite right. The Elite are not interested in you, me, overpopulation or the ennvironment. They know that their ‘place’ in the world, their economic system, built on Usury and Lies, cannot continue: that we are at the point of a change – the end of an age, as real as the end of feudalism, as the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. That the Free Market so beloved of the Wrest – wherein we simply bleed the third world dry for all it has at whatever cost, is at an end.
One could argue it is at an end because on of the last throws of the dice to defend the Free Market was to educate the third world and give it the technology which had raised Europe to command of the world. Of course like learing to read the Bible, once done, the reader can read all kinds of books. In a desperate attempt to keep control, keep the profits running in, the International Global Financial Elite gave away the secrets of it’s success.
Not being a communist, I am not saying that we are heading to some lovely utopia, where the lion lays around with a lamb, or that sales of former swords recycled as ploughshares is ‘what’s coming’. We are living in a mkore equal world, where kbnowledge is widely diffused through the internet. Our Elite – so powerful for so long faces challenges abroad.
They are unable to control seven billion people, their profit is spread more thinly. Small populations are easier to control, especially if, cattle and horse like, you get to choose who breeds with who, what they eat, how they are cared for. They no longer need us in the West – that has been obvious for twenty years. And with the spread of technology – especially millitary – the need for huge land armies has gone. And that is true around the world.
They just don’t need that many of us, they need a retarded, sef population, who will do the personal, nice things that mechanical solutions just can’t. The organic farming, the maidservants, the horsemmen, the stonemasons. That’s all.And they are not worried about us knowing:
I believe that Britain’s ‘overpopulation’ problem would be eased if:
Immigrantsof all non-European origin were returned to their natural homeland.
Agricultural land was redistributed away from the Elites and into the hands of productive small – 150 – 200 acre- farms (the Elite stole the land in the first place through Enclosure anyway).
Much present wasteland is brought into the hands of smallholders whose small scale methods would reap a reward where larger scale farming couldn’t.
Drop the environmental Green nazi crap – created by the Elites to reduce available productive agriculture – and get the country feeding itself, as far as possible.
I believe that Mr. Nicholas Griffin of the BNP has some good ideas along those lines – perhaps a trip here to the BNP would help.
Ted Heath, Prime Minister between 1970 and 1974, was a traitor, wgo encouraged many others to commit acts of sedition , false accounting and many other lesser crimes. But the biggie was treason and sedition, which would have until 1965, have carried a possible death penalty, and presently carries a life sentence.
Ted, of course, didn’t do this on his own. There are many alive today who were then involved in these acts as junior players.
The BNP have pulled off a superb victory. Superb? Stunning? Amazing? Astounding?
Against the massed rankls of the MEDIA, EACH and EVERY political party refusing to publicly debate, a STOOGE PARTY, the ENGLISH DEMOCRATS, a State organised faux opposition to the BNP if ever there was, the BNP won two seats at the European elections.
The Left are cacking themselves. Griffin and Bron will not only have access to the EU but ALL of it’s facilities. All the budget that Nigel Farage MEP was able to claim they will too. This means that the BNP will be able to PAY researchers, admin staff, office space, literature etc. It means that the BNP will be able to demand that the Police act when the filthy denziens of the gutter crawl from the murk with their calls of “blaandwioonianfi -smashthebenpee” and wave their little ANaL lollypops.
Think I exaggerate? Think that Gordon B., David C. or the other one whose a liberal, really give a tinkers cuss about you, your wife or children?
You’re wrong. The hate you and are personally implicitly involved in the purposeful holocaust – a literal blood sacrifice to celebrate their future Utopia – of the white British people.
They intend, because they hate 80% of all those they have ever seen, and they believe them to be inferior to themselves, to create and breed a new sub-race of serfs, to aid them in their future paradise.
